Measles Resurgence 2026: Experts Explain the Crisis
The United States is experiencing its worst measles resurgence in decades, with more than 5,000 cases reported in 2026 and growing concerns about vaccine confidence, public health preparedness, and the protection of vulnerable populations. The resurgence also raises important questions for people living with autoimmune disease, particularly those receiving treatments that suppress their immune systems.
On November 6, 2026, the Brown University Pandemic Center hosted a webinar, “Measles: Why It’s Not Stopping,” featuring Paul Offit, MD, of Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, and Jonathan Temte, MD, PhD, of the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health. Moderated by Jennifer Nuzzo, DrPH, director of the Pandemic Center, the discussion explored why measles is returning after its elimination in the United States in 2000, the consequences of declining vaccination rates, and what it will take to stop the outbreaks.
Why Is Measles Resurging in the United States?
Offit explained that the success of measles vaccination may have contributed to people forgetting how dangerous the disease can be, leaving misinformation about vaccine safety to fill that gap. Because measles is extraordinarily contagious, even relatively small pockets of unvaccinated people can experience substantial outbreaks. The panelists also emphasized that the resurgence is not being driven by measles mutations that evade vaccine protection. The existing vaccine remains highly effective, but declining and uneven vaccination coverage creates opportunities for transmission.
Temte described outbreaks concentrated in rural communities with historically low vaccination coverage, emphasizing that being unvaccinated does not necessarily mean someone opposes vaccines. Some communities have longstanding patterns of low immunization or limited engagement with preventive healthcare. The panelists stressed the importance of trusted community relationships, better access, and proactive outreach rather than waiting until outbreaks occur.
The resurgence is also affecting adults who were never vaccinated or infected during childhood. Offit described increasing cases among adults in Pennsylvania, including pregnant women exposed to measles, and warned about the return of congenital measles infections. These developments underscore that measles is not solely a childhood disease and can have particularly serious consequences for vulnerable populations.
As the United States faces the possibility of losing its measles elimination status, Nuzzo raised concerns about what the resurgence signals for the nation’s ability to respond to other infectious disease threats:
“
I think it is an enormous black eye on the reputation
of the United States.
— Jennifer Nuzzo, DrPH
Related Perspectives
Two Perspectives on the Measles Resurgence
The webinar followed an
NIH Scientific Freedom Lecture
on October 28 featuring Martin Kulldorff, PhD, who attributed
the measles resurgence largely to missed childhood vaccinations
during COVID-19 lockdowns and insufficient catch-up vaccination.
Kulldorff criticized public health officials for failing to
acknowledge this connection, framing the outbreaks as a
consequence of pandemic policies that he argued had undermined
public trust.
In contrast, the Brown University panel placed greater emphasis
on the ongoing consequences of measles transmission, including
preventable deaths, congenital infections, and the potential
loss of U.S. measles elimination status. The panelists also
examined longstanding vaccination gaps, misinformation, and
weaknesses in disease surveillance and community engagement.
GAI Review Cited in Federal Litigation
Kulldorff was also a coauthor of the Great Barrington Declaration,
which advocated developing population immunity to COVID-19 through
natural infection while protecting vulnerable groups.
GAI Chief Scientific Advisor Bruce Werness, MD,
examined the scientific assumptions and public health risks of
this approach in his review,
Debunking Herd Immunity: A Review of We Want Them Infected.
High vaccination coverage helps protect people who cannot safely receive certain vaccines or whose immune systems may not respond adequately to vaccination. This is especially important for some people living with autoimmune disease who receive immunosuppressive treatments. Because MMR is a live vaccine, it may be contraindicated for individuals with severe immunosuppression, depending on their treatment and medical circumstances.
For those at high risk of severe measles, exposure may require urgent medical evaluation and preventive treatment with immune globulin, which can provide temporary protection when administered promptly. These considerations illustrate why preventing measles transmission throughout the community remains so important.
A Child’s Plea for Protection
During the webinar, Paul Offit, MD, recalled the story of a
seven-year-old boy whose leukemia treatment left him
especially vulnerable to infectious diseases during
California’s 2015 measles outbreak. Offit remembered the
boy asking those opposing vaccination requirements a
powerful question:
“Don’t I count?”
The account appears to refer to Rhett Krawitt, who testified
in support of California Senate Bill 277, legislation aimed
at eliminating personal-belief exemptions from school
vaccination requirements. Rhett ended his testimony with
a memorable declaration:
“My name is Rhett, and I give a damn.”
His story illustrates why community vaccination matters for
people who cannot safely receive certain vaccines, including
some individuals receiving immunosuppressive treatments
for autoimmune diseases.
Editor’s Note: During the webinar, Offit
identified the boy as “Luke Crowley.” His account appears
to describe Rhett Krawitt, although the quotation
“Don’t I count?” has not been independently verified as
part of Rhett’s testimony.
Measles, Immune Amnesia, and Autoimmune Disease
Beyond its immediate symptoms, measles can have lasting effects on immune function through a phenomenon known as immune amnesia. Offit explained how this loss of previously acquired immune protection can increase susceptibility to other infections for years after recovery.
What Is Measles Immune Amnesia?
Our immune systems remember many of the infections and
vaccines we’ve encountered throughout our lives. Specialized
cells, including memory B cells and T cells, help the body
recognize familiar threats and respond more effectively
if they appear again.
Measles can disrupt this protection by infecting and
destroying immune cells, erasing some of the immune
system’s previously acquired memory. This phenomenon,
known as immune amnesia, means that even
after recovering from measles, a person may become more
vulnerable to infections their body previously knew
how to fight.
Before measles:
Memory immune cells help recognize pathogens the body
has encountered through past infections or vaccination.
After measles:
Some of these immune memory cells may be lost, reducing
protection against other infections even after the
person recovers.
Long-term effects:
Rebuilding that protection takes time. Offit explained
that increased susceptibility to other infections
typically persists for approximately two years and
may sometimes last as long as five years.
In other words, measles can leave someone with immunity
to measles itself while weakening parts of the immune
protection they had against other diseases.
The panel also discussed serious complications, including pneumonia, encephalitis, and subacute sclerosing panencephalitis (SSPE), a rare, fatal neurological condition that can emerge years later.
Near the webinar’s conclusion, the panel addressed claims that contracting measles could prevent cancer, heart disease, or autoimmune disease. Offit attributed these claims to Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and directly rejected them, emphasizing that there is no established scientific evidence supporting such protection.
Offit challenged the idea that immunity acquired through infection is inherently preferable to vaccination, suggesting that “natural immunity” would be better described as “survivor-induced immunity.” He recalled that both he and his children developed immunity to measles, but through very different experiences: he contracted the disease as a child, while his children received the vaccine.
“
They didn’t have to pay the price of natural infection
to get that immunity.
— Paul Offit, MD
How Safe Is the MMR Vaccine?
The discussion also offered a compelling example of the rigorous scientific review behind vaccine safety recommendations. Temte recalled chairing a working group evaluating the MMRV vaccine, which combines protection against measles, mumps, rubella, and varicella (chickenpox) into a single injection, rather than administering the three-disease MMR vaccine and chickenpox vaccine separately.
Although the four-disease vaccine was effective, safety monitoring identified a slightly increased risk of febrile seizures (seizures triggered by fever) following the first dose in young children. Temte explained that febrile seizures are generally brief and do not result in lasting neurological harm. Nevertheless, his working group spent an entire year investigating the finding, reviewing evidence, and debating the appropriate recommendations.
The resulting guidance favors separate MMR and varicella vaccines for the first dose in children ages 12–47 months, while generally preferring the combined MMRV vaccine for the second dose. Temte’s account demonstrated how even relatively uncommon adverse events receive careful scrutiny, with recommendations adjusted when scientific evidence warrants it.
“
We need to improve our communication in terms of not only
the high effectiveness of the vaccine, but the high level
of safety and the high scrutiny that safety gets with
any vaccine.
— Jonathan Temte, MD, PhD
How Can the U.S. Stop Measles Outbreaks?
The discussion also raised a difficult question: Can public confidence in vaccination be restored before more people experience the consequences of preventable outbreaks? Offit recalled asking Maurice Hilleman, who developed the measles vaccine, whether education about the vaccine’s safety and effectiveness, along with the dangers of measles, would be enough to maintain vaccination rates. According to Offit, Hilleman paused for a long time before responding, with a tear in his eye, that he believed the virus itself would ultimately have to educate the public.
Nuzzo offered a more hopeful perspective, arguing that communities should not have to experience preventable illness and death before taking action. She emphasized that many people in under-vaccinated communities are not necessarily opposed to vaccination and that public health agencies have opportunities to build trust, improve access, and engage with community leaders before outbreaks occur.
The measles resurgence has exposed vulnerabilities extending beyond declining vaccination coverage, including gaps in disease surveillance, community outreach, and public trust. As the panelists emphasized, preventing future outbreaks will require sustained engagement and stronger public health systems, particularly to protect people who cannot be vaccinated or whose immune systems may not provide adequate protection.
Audience Questions and Panelist Responses
The following questions and responses are condensed from the
November 6, 2026, webinar, Measles: Why It’s Not Stopping.
Responses reflect the panelists’ remarks rather than additional
analysis.
Can a vaccinated adult spread measles?
Offit explained that measles has a relatively long incubation
period, allowing immune memory cells activated by vaccination
time to respond and help stop viral replication. He emphasized
that vaccination has been effective in interrupting measles
transmission. Nuzzo added that no vaccine provides complete
protection, particularly when people experience substantial
exposure during outbreaks.
Paul Offit and Jennifer Nuzzo | Approx. 33:37
Has the measles virus changed or mutated in a way that explains the resurgence?
Temte said that although measles viruses can undergo
mutations, circulating viruses remain well covered by existing
vaccines. Offit added that measles has not meaningfully
evolved to escape vaccine recognition. Both attributed the
resurgence to declining vaccination coverage rather than
changes in the virus.
Jonathan Temte and Paul Offit | Approx. 35:45
What would losing U.S. measles elimination status mean?
Temte said he believed the United States was likely to lose
its status and emphasized that elimination depends on reliable
disease surveillance. Offit argued that the designation would
not change the reality that measles had regained a foothold
in the country. Temte disagreed with the suggestion that the
designation was unimportant, describing its loss as a
reflection of the country’s public health systems and
commitment to disease prevention. Nuzzo also emphasized its
significance for U.S. public health preparedness and
international reputation.
Jonathan Temte, Paul Offit, and Jennifer Nuzzo |
Approx. 26:22–33:25
Can countries regain measles elimination status after losing it?
Nuzzo pointed to Brazil and Venezuela as examples of
countries that had previously lost and regained elimination
status. She emphasized that renewed vaccination efforts
and stronger outbreak prevention could make it possible
to regain the designation.
Jennifer Nuzzo | Approx. 37:40
How should public health officials reach communities with low vaccination rates?
Offit described previous efforts to work with trusted
religious leaders during outbreaks. Temte emphasized that
messages about protecting a parent’s own child may be more
persuasive than appeals to public health alone. Nuzzo argued
that building relationships with communities should be an
ongoing responsibility of public health agencies rather than
something that begins only during outbreaks.
Paul Offit, Jonathan Temte, and Jennifer Nuzzo |
Approx. 40:00–44:02
What are the risks of congenital measles?
Offit described the return of congenital measles infections
in Pennsylvania and discussed potentially severe
complications, including pneumonia, encephalitis, low platelet
counts, and disseminated intravascular coagulation. He also
raised concerns about subacute sclerosing panencephalitis
(SSPE), a rare neurological complication that may develop
after a shorter interval following congenital infection.
Paul Offit | Approx. 44:02
Could repeated COVID-19 infections be contributing to the measles resurgence?
Offit said he did not think SARS-CoV-2 infection itself
was setting people up for measles. He suggested that missed
vaccinations and disruptions in routine medical appointments
during the pandemic could have contributed. He also discussed
the reverse relationship: measles can cause immune amnesia,
potentially increasing susceptibility to other infections.
Paul Offit | Approx. 46:08
Could a defective batch of measles vaccine explain the outbreaks?
When asked whether a bad batch of vaccine could explain
reduced protection, the panelists indicated that they knew
of no evidence supporting that possibility. They did not
elaborate further.
Paul Offit and Jonathan Temte | Approx. 47:25
Why are state measles death counts different from CDC figures?
Nuzzo noted that several states had reported more
measles-associated deaths than appeared on the CDC dashboard.
Offit expressed concern that the outbreak’s true extent
was being underestimated and criticized the federal response.
Temte discussed the reduced role of the Advisory Committee
on Immunization Practices in addressing the measles crisis.
The panel did not establish a specific explanation for
the differences between reported death totals.
Jennifer Nuzzo, Paul Offit, and Jonathan Temte |
Approx. 47:38–52:23
Are people having difficulty accessing the MMR vaccine?
Temte described efforts within his health system to
communicate vaccination information to clinicians and
identify patients due for vaccines through electronic health
records. He emphasized the need to communicate the vaccine’s
safety and effectiveness. The panelists did not provide a
definitive assessment of whether access problems were
widespread.
Jonathan Temte and Paul Offit | Approx. 52:23
Would providing a measles-only vaccine be preferable to the combined MMR vaccine?
Offit said separating the three vaccines would prolong
the period during which children remained susceptible without
providing an established benefit. Temte described the
extensive review of the four-component MMRV vaccine following
a febrile-seizure safety signal and emphasized that he knew
of no evidence showing that the three components of MMR
would be safer if administered separately.
Paul Offit and Jonathan Temte | Approx. 57:07
Does getting measles protect against cancer, heart disease, or autoimmune disease?
Offit rejected claims that wild-type measles infection
prevents these conditions. He criticized the idea that
acquiring immunity through natural infection is inherently
beneficial, suggesting the term “survivor-induced immunity”
instead. He contrasted his own experience of contracting
measles with his children’s experience of receiving
vaccination, emphasizing that they gained immunity without
having to experience the infection.
Nuzzo, J. (Moderator), Offit, P., & Temte, J. (Presenters). (2026, November 6). Measles: Why it’s not stopping [Webinar]. Pandemic Center, Brown University.